Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js

Sunday, November 3, 2019

Field Theory - Theorem 2


 


Algebraic:

There exists a polynomial f with coefficients in field K such that f(u)=0. In this case, we say u is algebraic over K.

Transcendental:

There exists no polynoimal f with coefficients in field K such that f(u)=0 with the exception of zero polynomial. In this case, we say u is trascendental over K.

A field L containing field K is considered algebraic over K if every element of L is algebraic over K.

 

Theorem 2:
 
Suppose K is a field, u an element of larger field, and suppose that u is algebraic over K. Let f be a monic polynomial with coefficients in K of the minimal degree n such that f(u)=0. Then
(a) f is unique.
(b) f is irreducible over K.
(c) 1,u,u2,,un1 form a vector space basis for K(u) over K.
(d) [K[u]:K]=n.
(e) A polynomial g with coefficients in K satisfies g(u)=0 iff g is a multiple of f.


Proof:

Assume that there is another polynomial f, and let f0=ff. Since, both f and f are monic, the leading terms gets eliminated and f0 becomes a polynomial of degree less than n. This means, we have f0 a polynomial with degree less than n going to zero whenever f,f go to zero. However, this is a contradiction f is supposed to be of minial degree.

f is irreducible. Assume otherwise and write f=hg where h,g are polynomials of degree (obviously less than n). When f goes to zero, one or both of g,h will go to zero, thus contradicting the fact that fb is of minimal degree.

Linear relation between 1,u,u2,,uk1 indicates that there exists a polynomial g(u)=0 of degree less than n, thus proving that 1,u,u2,,un1 form a linearly independent set for K.

All we need to show is that T=K[u] is a field. Given all multiplicatons and additions we have been performing so far, not difficult to see that T is a ring.

Next we need to show that ukT. Clearly, 1,u,u2,,nn1T.
Now set an element uk1=1+u+u2++un1. Multiply both sidees by u. Then, uk=u+u2+u3++un. Since un can be expressed in terms of 1,u,u2,,un1, we have uk as a linear combination of these basis elements. Hence ukT.

To show that T is a field, we also need to show that every element has an inverse. Indeed if g is another polynomial of degree less than n, given that f is irreducible, we will have gcd(f,g)=1 which means there exists polynomials r,s of degree less than n such that fr+gs=1. Clear that when f gets sent to zero, the expression gs=1 indicating that s is inverse of the g.


If g is another polynomial with coefficients in K such that g(u)=0 then g is a multiple of f. If g is not a multiple of f (which is irreducible) then gcd(f,g)=0. This means that there are two polynomials r,s such that fr+gs=1. Since f(u)=0, then fr=0 and g(u)=0 means gs=0 leading to contradiction. Hence, g is a multiple of f.




Field extensions-Theorem 1

Notice the following tower of fields.

 Base field is K=Q, intermediate field is L=Q(3) and top field is M=Q(7).
Field L=Q(3)={a+b3|a,bQ}.
Field M=Q(3)={a+b3+c7+d7x3=21|a,b,c,dQ}

Note that the field M is a vector space over L and K. Indeed, from the expression M=Q(3)={a+b3+c7+d7x3=21|a,b,c,dQ} one can see that M as vector space over K has dimension 4.
That is [M:K]=4.
There is another way of expression M as a vector space over L

Letting u1,u2 be elements of this form u1=a+b3 and u2=c+d3, one can express elements of M as u1+7(u2).
That is [M:L]=2. Similarly [L:K]=2. Thus,
[M:K]=[M:L][L:K]=22=4.

First theorem of Field extensions formalizes these observations.

Theorem 1:Let K,L,M be fields with KLM. Then [M:K] is finite if and only if both [M:L] and [L:K]  are finite and in that case [M:K]=[M:L][L:K].
Proof is a generalization of above observations.
Assume that [M:K] is finite, then consider L as subspace of M over K. As a subspace of finite vector space [L:K] is finite. Any basis that spans M over K (for example, {a,b,c,d} in above fields), also spans M over L; hence, [M:L] is also finite.

Assume the vector space M over L has [M:L]=m and L over K has [L:K]=n, then we need to show that [M:K]=mn.

Let zM. z can be expressed as z=iuihi where hiL. And hi=jcijvj. Putting all this together, z=ijcijuivj. i,j range over m and n. This is the spanning set for M over K.

To show this is independent, we need to show that whenever ijcijuivj=0 we need to have cij=0.
ijcijuivj can be rewritten as ihiui where hiL. Since ui form a basis for M over L, we must have each hi=0 and since this means cijvj=0 and independence of vj leads to each cij=0.

One consequence of this thoerem is that if the order of M/L is a prime, then this precludes any fields between M and L.



Friday, November 1, 2019

More examples of Galois groups

Let F=Q. Now, this time consider the polynomial (x22)(x23). Clearly the roots of the polynomial are ±2,±3. The splitting field for this polynomials is E(2,3)={a+b2+c3+d6|a,b,c,d,Q}. Notice, that x2=6 is also a root.

Dimension of E is 4 and easy to see that E is a vector space over F.

To derive Galois group, we start listing out the automorphisms of the extended field E that fix F.

Thus we are seeking σ that takes a root of x22 to a root of x22. That is σ(2)=±2. Similarly σ(3)=±3

The value of both these roots can be taken independently. The following lists all the automorphisms of that fix F.




Thus G=Gal(E/F)={σ1=Id,σ2,σ3,σ4}

It is interesting to note that we have intermediate fields between F and E. Naming them as B1=F and B5=E, we have other fields B2=Q(2),B3=Q(3),B4=Q(6).

These nested fields are shown below:




 As vector spaces Q(2) has dimension 2. Same is true of other intermediate field Q(3).Field Q(2,3) has dimension 4 over E=Q has dimensions 2 over
Q(2) and Q(3).

These examples lay foundation for understanding theorems about field extensions.

Simple example of a Galois Group:

Let Q be a field of rationals. Let x22 be a polynomial with rational coefficients. That is, let x22Q[x].

Since 2 is not a rational, the roots of equation x22 will not be in Q. However, if we extend this field by adjoining 2, then we have a new field over which the polynomial x22 has roots. This new field Q(2) is called splitting field of the polynomial. Elements of this field have form {a+b2|a,bQ}.

Let K=Q,L=Q(2)

We ask for all automorphisms of L  that fix K, namely ϕ:LL that fix K. These automorphisms must take a root of above polynomial to a root. Thus, we have two automorphisms.

Q(2) should map to 2. Identity automorphism Id meets this criteria. 

Consider automorphism ϕ1(2)2. Clearly, this will carry elements of Q(a+b2)ab2

If we collect all these automorphisms into a set, we have a set consisting of {Id,ϕ1}

Clearly ϕ1ϕ1=Id. Hence, above set forms  a group of order 2.  This Automorphism group is called Galois group denoted as Gal(L/K).

 

Chain complexes on Hilbert spaces

 Chain complexes are mathematical structures used extensively in algebraic topology, homological algebra, and other areas of mathematics. Th...